The state-wide ban on texting while driving goes into effect on Sunday....Violators face fines up to $150 if caught using handheld devices or laptops to send or read text messages, images or data while a vehicle is moving.
Friday, October 30, 2009
NY texting while driving ban starts Sunday
WHAM-TV:
Monday, October 26, 2009
Ovid Attorneys Work to Preserve Historic Local Courthouse
Gannett News service:

More information on the Friends of the Three Bears can be found here.
Trustees of the Friends of the Three Bears, a nonprofit organization working to preserve and find new uses for the Seneca County courthouse complex in Ovid, have decided to create some new positions to lessen the workload on their president of the past six years, Dan Motill....
Ovid attorney Mark Sinkiewicz has been selected to serve in the newly created position of administrative president. The other duties of president will be spread among other people. Another attorney, Steven Getman ... former Seneca County attorney, has taken over the duties of secretary...
More information on the Friends of the Three Bears can be found here.
Friday, October 23, 2009
State ends first-time home buyer incentive program
As reported here:
A new incentive program offered by New York state to encourage first-time home ownership has halted its application process.
Less than two month after rolling out the Mortgage Credit Certificate program, the state asked its lenders this week to stop taking general applications....The program was meant to bridge a gap for first-time buyers who may have run out of time to qualify for the $8,000 federal tax credit
Monday, October 12, 2009
New York Troopers launch cell phone crackdown on Thruway
More here. As noted in the article, "drivers caught breaking the law face a maximum fine of $100, along with a mandatory $60 surcharge."
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Presentation: Stopping Scam Artists Before They Strike
A representative from the New York State Attorney General's Office will be in Waterloo on Thursday, October 22 at 11:30 a.m. The purpose of the talk is to advise senior citizens on how to stop scam artists.
More details here.
More details here.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Village Refusal to Release Records to Child's Attorney Questioned
WATKINS GLEN (AUGUST 28)--The New York State Committee on Open Government has called into question a decision by Watkins Glen officials to deny a child’s attorney access to police reports involving that child's home.
According to attorney Steven Getman he requested the records June 12 as part of his preparation for a Family Court case involving the child’s home life. As part of that preparation, Getman said, he learned about a suspected break-in at the child’s residence and sought Village Police records about the incident to determine its relevance to the case.
At the time he made the request, Getman said, he presented the police with a copy of an order from the Schuyler County Family Court. That order, Getman noted, directed any agency having information about the child to provide him with copies. Getman also cited the New York State Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) in his request.

On June 29 police officials issued a decision refusing to release any records. According to the one-sentence decision the FOIL request was “Denied: Ongoing Investigation.” Later, in a July 16 letter, village officials again upheld the refusal, claiming that “no part of the records” Getman requested were available under FOIL.
Getman forwarded that letter, and his original applications, to the New York State Committee on Open Government and requested that it issue an advisory opinion on the Village’s refusal.
In a letter dated August 24, Robert Freeman, the committee’s Executive Director, encouraged the village to reconsider its actions. Noting that Getman, as attorney for the child, was acting as the child’s “law guardian,” Freeman opined that this appointment was “to ensure that the best interests of [the] child are … met.” He also noted that the Family Court order directing agencies to provide Getman with information about the child was “clear and unequivocal.”
“In an effort to encourage the Village to reconsider its blanket denial of your request, copies of this opinion will be forwarded to Village officials,” Freeman wrote.
As of August 28, Getman said he still hadn’t received any of the requested records. However, given the Committee’s advice, Getman hoped that the Village would respond and provide them shortly, or give a valid explanation as to why the records were withheld.
(UPDATE: On September 2, attorneys for the Village contacted Getman and stated that they were working with the Police Department to release the appropriate records.)
According to attorney Steven Getman he requested the records June 12 as part of his preparation for a Family Court case involving the child’s home life. As part of that preparation, Getman said, he learned about a suspected break-in at the child’s residence and sought Village Police records about the incident to determine its relevance to the case.
At the time he made the request, Getman said, he presented the police with a copy of an order from the Schuyler County Family Court. That order, Getman noted, directed any agency having information about the child to provide him with copies. Getman also cited the New York State Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) in his request.

On June 29 police officials issued a decision refusing to release any records. According to the one-sentence decision the FOIL request was “Denied: Ongoing Investigation.” Later, in a July 16 letter, village officials again upheld the refusal, claiming that “no part of the records” Getman requested were available under FOIL.
Getman forwarded that letter, and his original applications, to the New York State Committee on Open Government and requested that it issue an advisory opinion on the Village’s refusal.
In a letter dated August 24, Robert Freeman, the committee’s Executive Director, encouraged the village to reconsider its actions. Noting that Getman, as attorney for the child, was acting as the child’s “law guardian,” Freeman opined that this appointment was “to ensure that the best interests of [the] child are … met.” He also noted that the Family Court order directing agencies to provide Getman with information about the child was “clear and unequivocal.”
“In an effort to encourage the Village to reconsider its blanket denial of your request, copies of this opinion will be forwarded to Village officials,” Freeman wrote.
As of August 28, Getman said he still hadn’t received any of the requested records. However, given the Committee’s advice, Getman hoped that the Village would respond and provide them shortly, or give a valid explanation as to why the records were withheld.
(UPDATE: On September 2, attorneys for the Village contacted Getman and stated that they were working with the Police Department to release the appropriate records.)
Monday, August 10, 2009
New Laws to Effect Divorcing Parties’ Rights
Attorney Steven Getman is reminding New Yorkers that three laws will take effect this fall that directly impact matrimonial actions in that state.
Effective September 1, the Domestic Relations Law will provide for automatic stays whenever a matrimonial action is filed. According to Getman, these automatic stays are designed to prevent parties from transferring, disposing of or borrowing against assets “except in the usual course of business or for customary or usual household expenses, or for reasonable attorney's fees in connection with [the] action.” They also prohibit a divorcing spouse from removing the other party or the children from any existing medical, hospital and dental insurance coverage.
“The intent of this legislation is to preserve the status quo during a matrimonial proceeding.” Getman explained.
In addition, Getman said, under the new laws, courts must take additional steps to insure that both parties are notified as to the possible effects of a divorce on the right of each spouse to be covered by the other’s health insurance plan. That provision takes effect October 9.
Finally, the law has been amended to add the loss of health insurance coverage to the statutory factors a court must consider in making an award of Equitable Distribution and/or spousal maintenance, Getman noted. This measure is effective Sept. 26, 2009.
“These significant changes, effective in September and October, will directly impact on the rights of couples divorcing in New York State,” Getman said.
“Therefore, anyone contemplating dissolving their marriage should make sure to discuss these changes, and other legal issues related to separation and divorce with a qualified matrimonial attorney of their own choosing.”
Effective September 1, the Domestic Relations Law will provide for automatic stays whenever a matrimonial action is filed. According to Getman, these automatic stays are designed to prevent parties from transferring, disposing of or borrowing against assets “except in the usual course of business or for customary or usual household expenses, or for reasonable attorney's fees in connection with [the] action.” They also prohibit a divorcing spouse from removing the other party or the children from any existing medical, hospital and dental insurance coverage.
“The intent of this legislation is to preserve the status quo during a matrimonial proceeding.” Getman explained.
In addition, Getman said, under the new laws, courts must take additional steps to insure that both parties are notified as to the possible effects of a divorce on the right of each spouse to be covered by the other’s health insurance plan. That provision takes effect October 9.
Finally, the law has been amended to add the loss of health insurance coverage to the statutory factors a court must consider in making an award of Equitable Distribution and/or spousal maintenance, Getman noted. This measure is effective Sept. 26, 2009.
“These significant changes, effective in September and October, will directly impact on the rights of couples divorcing in New York State,” Getman said.
“Therefore, anyone contemplating dissolving their marriage should make sure to discuss these changes, and other legal issues related to separation and divorce with a qualified matrimonial attorney of their own choosing.”
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Attorney Warns: Beware Of Asphalt Paving Scams
Attorney Steven Getman is warning area residents to beware of scams concerning asphalt paving and driveway sealing.
The scams crop up every summer and follow a similar pattern, Getman said.
“Homeowners or merchants will be approached by a paving company rep making a cold call to say he's got asphalt left over from another job, and offering patchwork repairs at a low price,” Getman explained.
However, once an oral agreement is struck the pavers will commence to refinish the entire driveway or parking lot, and then present the victim with an exorbitant bill.
Sometimes when victims balk at paying, they are intimidated and threatened, police said.
Other times, the scammers offer a lifetime guarantee, but often the quality of the material used and application is inferior, and the work begins to crack quickly.
“Unfortunately, the paving crew is long gone by the time you discover you have a problem,” Getman said. “It may cost you more to redo the driveway after that.”
According to Getman, methods used by disreputable paving contractors can include:
Getman suggests that consumers take the following steps to protect themselves against scam companies:
“There are plenty of quality local contractors in our area, so be wary of transient pavers,” commented Getman.
Getman recommends that anyone who's had contact with what they believe to be a fraudulent paving company to contact their local police department and/or a competent attorney to review their legal rights.
The scams crop up every summer and follow a similar pattern, Getman said.
“Homeowners or merchants will be approached by a paving company rep making a cold call to say he's got asphalt left over from another job, and offering patchwork repairs at a low price,” Getman explained.
However, once an oral agreement is struck the pavers will commence to refinish the entire driveway or parking lot, and then present the victim with an exorbitant bill.
Sometimes when victims balk at paying, they are intimidated and threatened, police said.
Other times, the scammers offer a lifetime guarantee, but often the quality of the material used and application is inferior, and the work begins to crack quickly.
“Unfortunately, the paving crew is long gone by the time you discover you have a problem,” Getman said. “It may cost you more to redo the driveway after that.”
According to Getman, methods used by disreputable paving contractors can include:
• Little or no preparation work.
• Using cheap material
• Not using enough material
• Using untrained or inexperienced employees
• No way to contact them for repairs or follow up
• Intimidation or threatening of clients
Getman suggests that consumers take the following steps to protect themselves against scam companies:
• Contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB) for any complaints.
• Ask for local references and verify that the contractor is in compliance with local licensing, bonding and insuring requirements.
• Ask for identification and make note of the license plate number on the contractor vehicle.
• Solicit two or three bids for the work you are planning, but don't automatically accept the lowest.
• Make sure all bids are based on the same materials.
• Read all agreements and guarantees before signing.
• Make sure you understand all terms and conditions.
• Never sign a contract with sections left blank.
• Do not pay for work in advance. Pay by check when the work is completed to your satisfaction.
“There are plenty of quality local contractors in our area, so be wary of transient pavers,” commented Getman.
Getman recommends that anyone who's had contact with what they believe to be a fraudulent paving company to contact their local police department and/or a competent attorney to review their legal rights.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Seneca-Schuyler Scenic Byway Moving Forward
From the Ithaca Journal:
I am happy to be involved in such a worthy cause. For anyone interested in more information, or to support this project, please click here.
People working on the nomination packet proposing a scenic byway designation for a 19-mile sector of state Route 414 are hoping their goal is in sight.
****
The nomination packet, all 190 pages compiled over a period of nearly seven years, was forwarded to state Department of Transportation officials in Hornell in February for their consideration.
If the packet gets the green light, it will go to the state's Scenic Byway Advisory Committee for further consideration, possibly in September. Next in line, unless changes are recommended, is the state Legislature and finally the governor.
****
Scenic highways are those with unusual scenic, recreational, cultural or historic significance that are managed to encourage economic development through tourism and recreation.
There are more than 2,600 miles of scenic highways in New York state.
The section they are working on runs from Lodi in Seneca County south to Watkins Glen in Schuyler County.
Heading the local byway committee is chairman Barry O'Neill of Lodi.
[Chris] Kimball-Peterson of Hector is treasurer. Victoria Kelly, also of Hector, is secretary. A board of directors consist of Bruce Adams and George Kellogg, both of Hector, and attorney Steven Getman
I am happy to be involved in such a worthy cause. For anyone interested in more information, or to support this project, please click here.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Beware These Online Scams
Nine Nasty Online Scams You Need to Be Aware Of:
Don't fall for online tricks. These scams can cause you to lose large sums of money and result in "identity theft." If something sounds too good to be true, it almost always is. If you see an email that looks like a scam, don't hesitate to contact local law enforcement or seek the advice of a competent attorney.
1. Asian Invasion: The "Asian Extortion Scam" targets business owners, mostly of Asian decent, with death threats and other violence. Scammers pluck personal information about their targets from online searches and use the sensitive data to make victims feel vulnerable. The extortionists, who appear to be calling from outside the U.S., generally demand between $10,000 and $30,000 — though the FBI says there have been no reports of actual violence stemming from the schemes.
2. Mystery Shopping Scam: Some companies pay "mystery shoppers" to act as sample customers and test out the service at stores, banks and restaurants. But scammers are now targeting stay-at-home moms with "opportunities" to be defrauded of thousands of dollars. Victims receive a letter in the mail from a company offering about $400 for shopping at a few stores, along with a check for thousands of dollars to fund the purchases. The victim deposits the check into their back account, stops by a few stores and is then asked to wire about $2,000 back to the company. But when the original check bounces, victims are out the $2,000 they wired back — plus all the money they spent to go shopping.
3. Hit Man Scam: In the Hit Man e-mail scheme, scammers send letters claiming that the boyfriend, girlfriend or spouse of the recipient has arranged for their death. Another version says a loved one will be kidnapped unless an advance ransom is paid out immediately, naming specific relatives (information found courtesy of ... more online searches). [S]ome recipients feel anxious when the sender names their loved ones, which can make them more apt to believe the threat is authentic.
4. Million Dollar Scam: If you're offered a shot on the "Oprah Millionaire Contest Show," you're not going to be the lucky winner of $1 million — you're the target of a new scam. In order to participate, recipients of the scam e-mail must first send their contact information and are required to buy airfare and a ticket to the show in advance. Victims are later asked to fill out questionnaires seeking detailed personal information, which can put them at risk for identity theft. Other scammers have been mailing counterfeit checks with a letter that claims recipients they have won the "Oprah Show Summer Sweepstakes" — a contest that ended in 2006.
5. Grandparents Scam: "Hi grandma, it's your favorite grandson," says a scammer on the line. "Tommy, is that you?" "Yes, grandma, it's Tommy. Listen, my wallet was just stolen and I've lost all of my money. Do you think you could send me some to make it through the end of the month?" Unsuspecting victims, momentarily confused or suffering from hearing loss, go along with the story and wire money out — up to $15,000 in the case of one giving grandmother who thought she was sending $15,000 to help cover an auto accident, according to the Better Business Bureau.
6. Military Wheels: People posing as U.S. troops have been posting to classifieds Web sites offering cars on the cheap that they have to sell quickly before being deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq. The scams typically claim there is a third-party protection program to ensure a safe transaction, but when payments are sent to the "secure" service, victims either don't receive the car, or get stolen vehicles or ones with a salvaged title.
7. Jury Scam: Victims of the Jury Scam get an e-mail containing a fake subpoena ordering recipients to testify before a grand jury, complete with seemingly genuine details like your name, a case number and court seal. But the e-mails contain malware that can ruin a computer. Another version of the scam involves a phone call in which the caller claims to be a jury coordinator and intimidates victims into revealing personal information. Once the caller gets a victim's Social Security Number and birth date, it's all over.
8. Border Bust: Spam claiming to be from a former assistant commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Patrol says a foreign diplomat has been stopped with a consignment of thousands or even millions of dollars, which was found to be an inheritance for the recipient. Victims who get drawn in receive more e-mails claiming it is a crime to carry the consignment into the U.S., and demands personal information and a $250 fee to prove the recipient was not involved in a terrorist act. If they fail to do so, the spammers tell their victims they are proving they intended to smuggle the money into the U.S., which is a federal offense. Victims never receive a dime but will continue to get e-mails demanding more money for fees in connection with getting their "inheritance."
9. FBI Scams: The FBI says there have been "tons of complaints" about e-mails from people claiming to be FBI agents. Some appear to be from the Internet Crime Complaint Center and say the recipient has extorted money and must refund the money or face prosecution. Others, from the non-existent Anti-Terrorist and Monetary Crimes Division, inform recipients that they are the beneficiary of millions in inheritance. To claim the money, recipients must supply their full name, address and bank account number. Scammers even incorporate the names of top FBI executives into their e-mails by reading authentic FBI press releases, lending an air of credibility.
Don't fall for online tricks. These scams can cause you to lose large sums of money and result in "identity theft." If something sounds too good to be true, it almost always is. If you see an email that looks like a scam, don't hesitate to contact local law enforcement or seek the advice of a competent attorney.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)